View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: Conlang word order? |
|
|
Just out of curiosity, what's the dominant word order in most peoples conlangs? I think in reality SOV is most common, so I'm curious about conlangs.
PKM and Emitare are both VSO. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
imdamoos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 64 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I made Caelaurian SOV just because it was one less thing to figure out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hemicomputer
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 610 Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Holxws is OSV.
Drumu is SOV (I think, haven't quite worked it out.)
Sun has various word orders depending on the transitivity and negativity of a sentence:
Intransitive=SV
Intransitive Negative=NVS
Transitive=SOV
Transitive Negative=NVSO
Ditransitive=SDoVIo
Ditransitive Negative=NIoVSDo
With Do and Io being direct object and indirect object respectively, and N being the negation particle.
In a new one I've been working on, Geupasa, the most common word orders would likely be VSO and SVO. Don't expect to see more anytime soon, though. It's not ready yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aert
Joined: 03 Jul 2008 Posts: 354
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aert is SVO (though I thought this would be more common). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
achemel
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 556 Location: up for debate
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
If anyone's seen my conlang list you can tell I've got a bunch... I think they are about half SOV and half SVO. I have at least one that's VSO/VOS (it's flexible as long as the verb comes first) and one where adjective placement is a noticeable feature; I might post that one just for the heck of it. (^_^) My preference is SOV, because although SVO is easiest (being Englishish) I still have a good grasp on SOV.
I think the three languages I've posted so far are SVO... _________________ I have some small knowledge of:
English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Spanish, French
I would like to learn:
Italian, Norwegian, Gaelic
Main conlangs:
ddamachel, tadvaradcel, ra cel, lashel, hemnalg, nomah |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
killerken

Joined: 30 Sep 2008 Posts: 134 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fỉðâs is SOV. I can't remember why I chose it. There's no significance. _________________ Speak: English, Spanish
Invent: Fidhaas
Learn: Polish
Awesome: Yes |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kiri

Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 471 Location: Latvia/Italy
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I guess Vaijerīna is SOV,
but I have no idea what is the difference between subject and object (because of Latvian way of calling different things in the sentence)
But well, I seem to learn a lot in this site  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baldash
Joined: 19 May 2009 Posts: 86 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
SVO and SOV are as far as I know even among natural languages, which of them that appears to be most common depends on your sample. 40% SVO, 40% SOV, and 15% VSO, I think.
Most of my conlangs are VSO, VX (verb-oblique), NA (noun-adjective), PC (preposition-constituent), and AD (adjective/adverb-degree word). Or perhaps more concisely: WA/WM (word-argument/modifier) WA/WM is my favorite word order. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the replies, everybody. Seems there is mostly SOV and SVO in conlangs too.
@Baldash: So you prefer head-initial languages? (That's basically what you described.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baldash
Joined: 19 May 2009 Posts: 86 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tolkien_Freak wrote: | @Baldash: So you prefer head-initial languages? (That's basically what you described.) |
Yes, or "right-branching". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hemicomputer
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 610 Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree. Verb-initial orders are my favorite, don't know why I don't have many in my conlangs...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eldin raigmore Admin

Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Adpihi is VSO when unmarked.
But since it has topic-first, and focus-last, and given-first, and new-last, rules, it's "marked" more often than unmarked; though it's unmarked more often than any particular type of "marked".
"Marking" tends to put the verb second. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
@eldin: So it's VSO except when it's not?
Verb-initial word orders are fun, maybe just because they aren't that common in reality. Object-first ones are the ones you never see, though.
Anybody got any of those? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eldin raigmore Admin

Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tolkien_Freak wrote: | @eldin: So it's VSO except when it's not?  | Yes; verb-first except when verb-second, or, verb-second except when verb-first. I realize the difficulty of making a 'lang that's both verb-initial and verb-second.
Tolkien_Freak wrote: | Verb-initial word orders are fun, maybe just because they aren't that common in reality. | About 10% of world's languages, as opposed to >40% SVO and >40% SOV.
Tolkien_Freak wrote: | Object-first ones are the ones you never see, though. | Around 1%, maybe less, of world's languages.
Tolkien_Freak wrote: | Anybody got any of those? | tlHingaan by Marc Okrand, and a few famous natlangs. None of mine. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did not know Klingon was object-initial. That's cool.
BTW, my stupid family firewall/internet-security-thing is blocking a couple of recent threads in the Translations forum (the Quotes thread and the Things to Write thread), so if a mod / the posters could edit out any profanity or whatever to let me in that would be great. It's not that I have a problem with the content of the threads/posts/whatever, it's just that I'm being denied access to the threads in their entirety. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aeetlrcreejl

Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 839 Location: Over yonder
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jinnic is VSO (though I always forget), Tans is SVO, Lorošae is SOV. _________________ Iwocwá ĵọṭãsák.
/iwotSwa_H d`Z`Ot`~asa_Hk/
[iocwa_H d`Z`Ot`_h~a_Hk] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|