Vreleksá Forum Index Vreleksá
The Alurhsa Word for Constructed: Creativity in both scripts and languages
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The evolution of Conlangs...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vreleksá Forum Index -> Conlangs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dusepo



Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:50 pm    Post subject: The evolution of Conlangs... Reply with quote

Retfon has been under construction now for about 4 months now. In that time, it has taken basic shape. However, there are some things I am still not happy with, and it is still quite basic and needs work. I am thinking of creating a 'New Retfon' which would evolve from a dialect or by mixing with an invading culture.

I know some of you have created many dialects of your conlangs, and some have created many conlangs. And so, as I am new here and relatively new to conlanging, I come here to ask your help! Any ideas?

I would also love to mix my conlang with anyone elses, if that's ok with them? In effect, I'd love for someone to invade my conworld, lol.
_________________
My Website
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
langover94



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 509
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since my conlang was not origianally going to be used for a conworld, I do not have any dialects.

If you are still not happy with your conlang you could do one of two things:

-Let your language evolve naturally, through frequent speaking
-Reform your language, like you want to do.

I would personally go with the first one, because languages do not evolve over night. But the second option is also feasible.
_________________
Join us at: The Renewed Spirits Forum!
Please join for good discussion. (We need members!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eldin raigmore
Admin


Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 1621
Location: SouthEast Michigan

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

langover94 wrote:
-Let your language evolve naturally, through frequent speaking
Conlangers like to simulate language-evolution through regular sound changes. There are several software tools available -- many of them by conlangers for conlangers, but all useful to conlangers -- to allow you to simulate such sound-changes. There are also at least one sound-change-reverser.

IMO Langover's idea of speaking your own conlang yourself, is a good way to guess which sound-changes are likely to occur. But if that seems to take too long for you, you can just guess at a bunch. A different bunch would lead to a different dialect. (Speaking it yourself, you will probably run into some times where two different sound-changes suggest themselves, and you don't see how both can happen at once; so you could get different dialects that way, too. But, again, maybe you don't have the patience, or for some other reason you need to come up with the dialects before you can speak a lot of your conlang.)

Don't forget: Sound changes will drive changes in the rest of the language; changes in vocabulary/lexicon, changes in morphology, and changes in syntax. It happened to English and to French, for example.

----------------------------------------

Evolution driven solely by regular sound-changes, is an internal-only process. Evolution can also be driven by language-contact.
Indeed: almost every language has some technique for borrowing something -- usually vocabulary -- from other languages.

Piraha (pardon the mis-spelling) may not have any such means to borrow.

Tariana-speakers are all at least bilingual; they have a linguistic-exogamy rule. Also, they have a "rule" against "language-mixing". What that really means is, if you're speaking one language and you use a word from a different language, everyone will laugh at you. Thus, Tariana tends to borrow features that are less obvious to the "linguistically-naive"* speaker, such as grammar and accidents (rather as if an English speaker decided to put evidentials and directionals into English because he'd learned some Native American languages, or to make it topic-prominent because he'd learned some Asian ones, or to distinguish between alienable and inalienable possession because he'd learned some Polynesian languages.)
*"Linguistically-naive", in this case, doesn't mean they don't know four or more languages; it means they have not been formally instructed in the science of linguistics, and have not learnt those languages from reference-grammars, and have not had the opportunity to compare a lot of reference-grammars, and have not had occasion to try to write a textbook to teach one of those languages.

But most languages borrow vocabulary.

French tries not to. Or rather, their academy tries to stop it. But the average French-speaker just goes ahead and borrows.

Nouns are the most frequently borrowed; especially, of course, proper-nouns; but common-nouns as well. Verbs and adjectives are also borrowed rather easily. I don't know about other parts-of-speech.

If you look at the Swadesh list you'll see a set of words that probably should not be borrowed, if you want to be realistic. These words were chosen for robustness against borrowing and robustness against "semantic drift" (changes in meaning). But, conlangers like to make conlangs that screw with hypotheses; maybe you want a dialect that borrows all of these words, but does not borrow "Internet" or "PC" or "spreadheet" or "CRT" or "CPU" or "monitor" or "floppy disk" or "astronaut" or "jet" or "airplane" or ...

When one people conquers another, the standard wisdom is that the new linguistic situation adopts the conquerors' grammar and the conqured people's vocabulary. Certainly any plants, animals, artifacts, or proper-named features of the landscape, that are in the conquered area but not in the ancestral home of the conquerors, will probably have their names borrowed into the conquerors' language.

OTOH in pidgins and creoles, especially English-based ones, the opposite seems to have happened; they tend to have an English vocabulary, but have subject-peoples' morphology, such as dual and trial numbers, and a distinction between inclusive and exclusive first-person non-singular.
_________________
"We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vreleksá Forum Index -> Conlangs
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Theme ACID © 2003 par HEDONISM Web Hosting Directory


Start Your Own Video Sharing Site

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | FlashWebHost.com | Image Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBBweb.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com