|
Vreleksá The Alurhsa Word for Constructed: Creativity in both scripts and languages
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Vortex
Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:20 pm Post subject: Hasu Khomiyo |
|
|
phonology:
consonants:
/p p_h p_j t t_h t_j ts) ts_j) ts_h) k k_h k_j ? ?_j/ <p ph py t th ty c cy ch k kh ky 'y>
/f f_j s s_j h h_j/ <f>
/m hm m_j n hn n_j N hN/ <m hm my n hn nj ng hng>
/w hw 4 h4 4_j l hl l_j j/ <w hw r hr ry l hl ly y>
/p: t: k: ts): f: s: h: m: n: N: w: r: l: j:/ <pp tt kk cc ff ss hh mm nn ngg ww rr ll yy>
Vowels:
/a e i o u/ <a e i o u>
/ae) ai) ao) au) ea) ei) eo) eu) oa) oe) oi) ou) ua) ue) ui) uo)/ <ae ai ao au ea ei eo eu oa oe oi ou ua ue ui uo>
basic word structure
(N+S)/(C)(r, l)V/D(N+S)/(C)(V/D)(C)(V)
verbs are either 1 or 2 syllables long and must end in a vowel
nouns are 1-3 syllables long and can end in a consonant
Allophony/phonotactics:
- all long stops are realized as ejectives
- palatalized consonants cannot appear before /i/
- only short plain stops or /ts)/ can combine with /l r/ to form a cluster and these stops can be preceded by a nasal stop at the same point of articulation
- if two consonants are placed next to each other due to place affixes together then a vowel that is the same as the previous affixes last vowel is place in between them unless the consonants form these clusters: S+F, N+S, N+F, S+A, F+A, S+N, S+S, and F+N. None of those consonants can be long.
- /s f/ becomes [z v] when following a voiced consonant
- /l_j s_j ts_j) h_j k_j n_j/ are realized as [L s` ts`) C c J]
-/w/ becomes [v] word final
-/p t k/ are realized as [p_} t_} k_}] word final
-/k k_h k:/ are realized as [q q_h q_>] word final
Pronouns:
1st person- ngue
1st person exclusive dual- ntau
1st person inclusive dual- ngawe
1st person exclusive plural- ntu
1st person inclusive plural- pyann
2nd person- conua
2nd person polite- wasan
2nd person dual- caonua
2nd person polite dual- wa’asan
2nd person plural- conuasi
2nd person plural polite- wasansi
3rd person- an
3rd person dual- ane
3rd person plural- asi
Verb personal clitics:
1st person- -wa
1st person exclusive dual- -tu
1st person inclusive dual- -nga
1st person exclusive plural- -ntu
1st person inclusive plural- -pya
2nd person- -ya
2nd person polite- -yu
2nd person dual- -ma
2nd person polite dual- -mu
2nd person plural- -ha
2nd person plural polite- -hu
3rd person- -wu
3rd person dual- -nu
3rd person plural- -su
These mark the patient of intransitive sentence and the agent of a transitive sentence. They are not used if the corresponding pronouns are being used.
Eg. langkkimao- to run
Langkkiwa- I run
Langkkiya/ langkkiyu- You run
Langkkiwu- he/she/it runs
Langkkinga- we (dual) run
Langkkima/ langkkimu- you two run
Langkkinu- those two run
Langkkitu- we (dual excl.) run
Langkkipya- we run
Langkkiha/ langkkihu- y’all run
Langkkisu- they run
Langkkintu- we (excl.) run
Verb object suffixes
1st person- -ma
1st person exclusive dual- -he
1st person inclusive dual- -hi
1st person exclusive plural- -em
1st person inclusive plural- -am
2nd person- -so
2nd person polite- -ka
2nd person dual- -hma
2nd person plural- -om
3rd person- -si
3rd person dual- -wwe
3rd person plural- -myan
Basic word order is PAV.
Cases are:
Absolutive
Ergative –ssa
Dative –kou
Instrumental –ffi
Genitive –ppa
Locative –soa
Lative –kha
Ablative –kku
Perlative/presecutive –fua
Plural and duals
Human plural, infix –ma-; human dual, reduplication of first syllable
Inhuman plural, suffix –si; inhuman dual, infix –ta
hasu khomijolao has prefixes that show a noun is a part of a group and the are:
nem-
hmua-
ngkki-
hmua- and nem- are only used human nouns and ngkki- is used for both humans and non-humans.
hmua- shows that the group is apart of the person's family and nem- shows that the members of the group are not members of the person's family. when ngkki- is used on a human noun it shows that the things in group are the person's possessions.
tense prefixes:
present tense is not marked
distant past t-
near past w-
near future ph-
distant future hr-
aspect prefixes
imperfect a- (only used in non present tenses)
perfect o-
perfective i-
habitual e-
progressive oa-
the order of the tense and aspect prefixes go on the verb is: tense-aspect-verb root.
evidentuality suffixes:
witnessed- not marked on verb
hearsay -kkum
inferential -neam
common knowledge -tuak
These are placed last on verb.
location/directional suffixes:
-ngakor “up”
-nul “down”
-haen “away (from)”
-tupu “uphill”
-nyau “downhill
-hmang “back and forth”
-tumpa “back(wards)”
-nantra “forwards”
-hloe “east(wards)
-peu “north(wards)”
-reitu “south(wards)”
-louka “west(wards)”
-tal “no movement”
-ta’an “to here”
-mutol “to there”
-tlan “here”
-matan “there”
More than one of these suffixes can be place on a verb and are placed before evidentiality suffixes
So what do y'all think about it? I will post some examples later.
Last edited by Vortex on Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:41 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
langover94
Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 509 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vortex wrote: | /f f_j s s_j h h_j/ <f>
/m hm m_j n hn n_j N hN/ <m>
/w hw 4 h4 4_j l hl l_j j/ <w>
/p: t: k: ts): f: s: h: m: n: N: w: r: l: j:/ <pp>
Vowels:
/a e i o u/ <a>
/ae) ai) ao) au) ea) ei) eo) eu) oa) oe) oi) ou) ua) ue) ui) uo)/ <ae> |
All those sounds for one or two letters? Not exactly practical.
For <f>, I think that /f/ is fine... How can you have a palatalised /f/? And /s s_j h h_j/? That's icky. Just use <s> and <h>.
For <m>, /m hm/ are fine... How can you have a palatalised /m/? As for /n hn n_j N hN/, why not just use <n>?
For <w> /w hw/ are fine. /4 h4 4_j l hl l_j j/ I don't know about those being represented by <w>. Just use <r> and <l> and <y>.
As for the other ones, I think you get my drift.
Quote: | /ae) ai) ao) au) ea) ei) eo) eu) oa) oe) oi) ou) ua) ue) ui) uo)/ <ae> |
_________________ Join us at: The Renewed Spirits Forum!
Please join for good discussion. (We need members!) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vortex
Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok for some reason the forum won't show most of the letters inbetween <> and the reason for the all the palatalized consonants is because of the old "i+vowel or diphthong" combinations. In some dialects /m_j/ and /n_j/ have merged and yes it is possible to pronounce both /m_j/ and /f_j/. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aeetlrcreejl
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 839 Location: Over yonder
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's happened to me too. Turn off HTML. _________________ Iwocwá ĵọṭãsák.
/iwotSwa_H d`Z`Ot`~asa_Hk/
[iocwa_H d`Z`Ot`_h~a_Hk] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
langover94
Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 509 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vortex wrote: | Ok for some reason the forum won't show most of the letters inbetween <> and the reason for the all the palatalized consonants is because of the old "i+vowel or diphthong" combinations. In some dialects /m_j/ and /n_j/ have merged and yes it is possible to pronounce both /m_j/ and /f_j/. |
Ahhh I see. I would like to see more of the letters _________________ Join us at: The Renewed Spirits Forum!
Please join for good discussion. (We need members!) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tolkien_Freak
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
/4/ is orthographized as <w>? Or did you just leave out the letters because of HTML? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eldin raigmore Admin
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vortex wrote: | Ok for some reason the forum won't show most of the letters inbetween <> |
You need to disable HTML. I keep mine disabled by default.
You may also have trouble with "[ ]" stuff because of BBCode. I usually make sure there are spaces before and after the square brackets. But if I'm not boldfacing, italicizing, underlining, quoting, coding, listing, imaging, or URLing, I might disdable BBcode. (As a default, though, I keep it enabled).
Sometimes you have trouble with ")". This is because of Smilies.
The most common thing is for people to write a list, "1) 2) ... 6) 7) 9) 10) ... 16) 17) 1 19) 20) ..." and be surprised about the "cool" smiley.
I keep my smilies disabled by default. (It's a profile option). But frequently I have to enable them on a post-by-post basis, as for instance in this post. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eldin raigmore Admin
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: Re: Hasu Khomiyolao |
|
|
Vortex wrote: |
basic word structure
(N+S)/(C)(r, l)V/D(N+S)/(C)(V/D)(C)(V)
verbs are either 1 or 2 syllables long and must end in a vowel
nouns are 1-3 syllables long and can end in a consonant
| Good! But what do the "+" and "/" notations mean?
Vortex wrote: |
Allophony/phonotactics:
- if two consonants are placed next to each other due to place affixes together then a vowel that is the same as the previous affixes last vowel is place in between them unless the consonants form these clusters: S+F, N+S, N+F, S+A, F+A, S+N, S+S, and F+N. None of those consonants can be long.
| What consonants are in the "A", "F", "N", and "S" groups?
Vortex wrote: |
Pronouns:
1st person- ngue
1st person exclusive dual- ntau
1st person inclusive dual- ngawe
1st person exclusive plural- ntu
1st person inclusive plural- pyann
2nd person- conua
2nd person polite- wasan
2nd person dual- caonua
2nd person polite dual- wa’asan
2nd person plural- conuasi
2nd person plural polite- wasansi
3rd person- an
3rd person dual- ane
3rd person plural- asi
Verb personal clitics:
1st person- -wa
1st person exclusive dual- -tu
1st person inclusive dual- -nga
1st person exclusive plural- -ntu
1st person inclusive plural- -pya
2nd person- -ya
2nd person polite- -yu
2nd person dual- -ma
2nd person polite dual- -mu
2nd person plural- -ha
2nd person plural polite- -hu
3rd person- -wu
3rd person dual- -nu
3rd person plural- -su
These mark the patient of intransitive sentence and the agent of a transitive sentence. They are not used if the corresponding pronouns are being used.
| "Patient of intransitive sentence"? Explain and exemplify, please?
Vortex wrote: |
Eg. langkkimao- to run
Langkkiwa- I run
Langkkiya/ langkkiyu- You run
Langkkiwu- he/she/it runs
Langkkinga- we (dual) run
Langkkima/ langkkimu- you two run
Langkkinu- those two run
Langkkitu- we (dual excl.) run
Langkkipya- we run
Langkkiha/ langkkihu- y’all run
Langkkisu- they run
Langkkintu- we (excl.) run
Verb object suffixes
1st person- -ma
1st person exclusive dual- -he
1st person inclusive dual- -hi
1st person exclusive plural- -em
1st person inclusive plural- -am
2nd person- -so
2nd person polite- -ka
2nd person dual- -hma
2nd person plural- -om
3rd person- -si
3rd person dual- -wwe
3rd person plural- -myan
| So, polypersonal agreement up to two participants? Good.
Vortex wrote: |
Basic word order is PAV.
Cases are:
Absolutive
Ergative –ssa
Dative –kou
Instrumental –ffi
Genitive –ppa
Locative –soa
Lative –kha
Ablative –kku
Perlative/presecutive –fua
Plural and duals
Human plural, infix –ma-; human dual, reduplication of first syllable
Inhuman plural, suffix –si; inhuman dual, infix –ta
| Good.
Vortex wrote: |
hasu khomijolao has prefixes that show a noun is a part of a group and the are:
nem-
hmua-
ngkki-
hmua- and nem- are only used human nouns and ngkki- is used for both humans and non-humans.
hmua- shows that the group is apart of the person's family and nem- shows that the members of the group are not members of the person's family. when ngkki- is used on a human noun it shows that the things in group are the person's possessions.
| "Associative plurals" or "associative (grammatical) number", right? Or would "collective" be the better term than "associative"? Or some are associative and some are collective?
Vortex wrote: |
tense prefixes:
present tense is not marked
distant past t-
near past w-
near future ph-
distant future hr-
| (As you know) I like degrees of remoteness. Good.
Vortex wrote: |
aspect prefixes
imperfect a- (only used in non present tenses)
perfect o-
perfective i-
habitual e-
progressive oa-
the order of the tense and aspect prefixes go on the verb is: tense-aspect-verb root.
evidentuality suffixes:
witnessed- not marked on verb
hearsay -kkum
inferential -neam
common knowledge -tuak
These are placed last on verb.
location/directional suffixes:
-ngakor “up”
-nul “down”
-haen “away (from)”
-tupu “uphill”
-nyau “downhill
-hmang “back and forth”
-tumpa “back(wards)”
-nantra “forwards”
-hloe “east(wards)
-peu “north(wards)”
-reitu “south(wards)”
-louka “west(wards)”
-tal “no movement”
-ta’an “to here”
-mutol “to there”
-tlan “here”
-matan “there”
More than one of these suffixes can be place on a verb and are placed before evidentiality suffixes
So what do y'all think about it? I will post some examples later. |
I like it a lot. This doesn't mean I think it's perfect, but obviously you know your stuff. And you're more willing to commit than I've been so far. I want to see more. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vortex
Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:19 am Post subject: Re: Hasu Khomiyolao |
|
|
eldin raigmore wrote: | Vortex wrote: |
basic word structure
(N+S)/(C)(r, l)V/D(N+S)/(C)(V/D)(C)(V)
verbs are either 1 or 2 syllables long and must end in a vowel
nouns are 1-3 syllables long and can end in a consonant
| Good! But what do the "+" and "/" notations mean?
Vortex wrote: |
Allophony/phonotactics:
- if two consonants are placed next to each other due to place affixes together then a vowel that is the same as the previous affixes last vowel is place in between them unless the consonants form these clusters: S+F, N+S, N+F, S+A, F+A, S+N, S+S, and F+N. None of those consonants can be long.
| What consonants are in the "A", "F", "N", and "S" groups?
Vortex wrote: |
Pronouns:
1st person- ngue
1st person exclusive dual- ntau
1st person inclusive dual- ngawe
1st person exclusive plural- ntu
1st person inclusive plural- pyann
2nd person- conua
2nd person polite- wasan
2nd person dual- caonua
2nd person polite dual- wa’asan
2nd person plural- conuasi
2nd person plural polite- wasansi
3rd person- an
3rd person dual- ane
3rd person plural- asi
Verb personal clitics:
1st person- -wa
1st person exclusive dual- -tu
1st person inclusive dual- -nga
1st person exclusive plural- -ntu
1st person inclusive plural- -pya
2nd person- -ya
2nd person polite- -yu
2nd person dual- -ma
2nd person polite dual- -mu
2nd person plural- -ha
2nd person plural polite- -hu
3rd person- -wu
3rd person dual- -nu
3rd person plural- -su
These mark the patient of intransitive sentence and the agent of a transitive sentence. They are not used if the corresponding pronouns are being used.
| "Patient of intransitive sentence"? Explain and exemplify, please?
Vortex wrote: |
Eg. langkkimao- to run
Langkkiwa- I run
Langkkiya/ langkkiyu- You run
Langkkiwu- he/she/it runs
Langkkinga- we (dual) run
Langkkima/ langkkimu- you two run
Langkkinu- those two run
Langkkitu- we (dual excl.) run
Langkkipya- we run
Langkkiha/ langkkihu- y’all run
Langkkisu- they run
Langkkintu- we (excl.) run
Verb object suffixes
1st person- -ma
1st person exclusive dual- -he
1st person inclusive dual- -hi
1st person exclusive plural- -em
1st person inclusive plural- -am
2nd person- -so
2nd person polite- -ka
2nd person dual- -hma
2nd person plural- -om
3rd person- -si
3rd person dual- -wwe
3rd person plural- -myan
| So, polypersonal agreement up to two participants? Good.
Vortex wrote: |
hasu khomijolao has prefixes that show a noun is a part of a group and the are:
nem-
hmua-
ngkki-
hmua- and nem- are only used human nouns and ngkki- is used for both humans and non-humans.
hmua- shows that the group is apart of the person's family and nem- shows that the members of the group are not members of the person's family. when ngkki- is used on a human noun it shows that the things in group are the person's possessions.
| "Associative plurals" or "associative (grammatical) number", right? Or would "collective" be the better term than "associative"? Or some are associative and some are collective?
<snip>
I want to see more. |
ok, the "A", "F", "N", and "S" groups stand for approximate, fricative, nasal and stop. When i say N+S i mean nasal plus stop and the / separate the two possible types of sounds that can appear in that spot. THe whole patient of a intransitive sentence was a typo i meant to say subject of an intranistive verb. And I believe that those special plurals would be collective plurals. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eldin raigmore Admin
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: Re: Hasu Khomiyolao |
|
|
Vortex wrote: | ok, the "A", "F", "N", and "S" groups stand for approximate, fricative, nasal and stop. When i say N+S i mean nasal plus stop and the / separate the two possible types of sounds that can appear in that spot. THe whole patient of a intransitive sentence was a typo i meant to say subject of an intranistive verb. And I believe that those special plurals would be collective plurals. | Thanks.
(BTW "approximant", not "approximate". Though obviously the meanings are close.)
Does the
(N+S)/(C)(r,l)
mean, then, that your syllable onsets (at least, for a word's first syllable) could be:
No onset
Any single consonant
Any single liquid
Any one consonant followed by any liquid
Any nasal followed by any stop
Any nasal followed by any stop followed by any liquid
?
So essentially,
there doesn't have to be an onset;
any single consonant could be an onset;
if any two-consonant cluster is an onset, it must either be
-- the second consonant is a liquid or
-- the first consonant is a nasal and the second consonant is a stop;
if any three-consonant cluster is an onset, then the first consonant is a nasal, the second consonant is a stop, and the third consonant is a liquid;
clusters of four or more consonants are not allowed as onsets?
And word-internally but not syllable-internally, the only consonant-clusters permitted are
F+A, F+N,
N+F, N+S,
S+A, S+F, S+N, S+S
?
And specifically prohibited are
A+A, A+F, A+N, A+S,
F+F, F+S,
N+A, N+N
?
Also, BTW, I forgot to ask; what is the "D" group? "Diphthong", right?
----------------------------------------
EDIT: I guess what I want is for you to show us some words that this structure derives and how/why it derives them, as well as some near-misses and how/why they aren't derived by this structure. I'm hoping each choice indicated by a "( )" or by a "/" can be illustrated. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vortex
Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok first off I just want to get across that the baisc root structure was just a simple out line and there are more rules then what was shown in that. And here are those rules:
The onset can consist of the following; any consonant, a nasal plus a stop, stop plus l or r, a nasal + a stop + r or l. there are no four consonant clusters allowed in any part of the word. /?/ is not allowed in the onset but /?_j/ is. The word internal cluster are fromed only as a result of affixation except for the stop plus l or r, nasal plus stop, or nasal plus stop plus l or r. If any internal consonant cluster appears that is not allowed then a vowel of the same type as the previous syllable is place inbetween the two consonants. If two vowel don't form a diphthong, which what D stands for, then they are separated by a glottal stop. No triphthong are allowed and same with 4 vowel clusters. The only sounds not allowed word final is /j/ and /j:/.
Thanks for correcting my typo. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eldin raigmore Admin
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's clear. Thanks. I look forward to more. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yssida
Joined: 16 Sep 2007 Posts: 253 Location: sa jaan lang
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | "Patient of intransitive sentence"? Explain and exemplify, please?
|
Please correct me on this if wrong, I'm confused why it has to refer to both the 'patient' of an intransitive yet agent of a transitive when it's erg-abs. The alignment doesn't look 'aligned' to me, or is this a typo?
Is the patient of an intransitive like a S? Or is this like an oblique argument? _________________ kasabot ka ani? aw di tingali ka bisaya mao na
my freewebs site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vortex
Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
LIke I said in an earlier post that was a typo and I meant to say subject intransitive sentence. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yssida
Joined: 16 Sep 2007 Posts: 253 Location: sa jaan lang
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
So it is S. But my question still hold as to why it was like that. The alignment doesn't seem to 'align' to me. Please clear me up. I'm just interested _________________ kasabot ka ani? aw di tingali ka bisaya mao na
my freewebs site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eldin raigmore Admin
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yssida wrote: | So it is S. But my question still hold as to why it was like that. The alignment doesn't seem to 'align' to me. Please clear me up. I'm just interested |
I don't understand your question.
Is it that if the intransitive Subject and the transitive Agent are treated similarly, but the transitive Patient is treated differently, that's "Accusative" alignment instead of "Ergative" alignment?
Is it that in Ergative/Absolutive alignment systems, the intransitive Subject and the transitive Patient are treated similarly, but the transitive agent is treated differently?
If so, then, right, Vortex needs to clear that up.
Something that marks the Subject of an intransitive or the Agent of a transitive is usually called "Nominative".
Something called "Absolutive" usually marks the Subject of an intransitive or the Patient of a transitive.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe some of us aren't familiar with different morphosyntactic alignments?
If not, here are the basics.
The prototypical transitive clause has two participants, the agent and the patient.
Almost all languages include, in such clauses, some way to tell which participant has which role; that is, which is the agent and which is the patient. For instance, it may ordinarily put the agent in one case and the patient in another.
The prototypical intransitive clause has just one participant.
Morphosyntactic alignment is, to the first approximation at least, the answer to the question of how treatment of the only participant in monovalent, intransitive clauses, compares to the treatment of the participants in bivalent, monotransitive clauses.
In "Accusative" languages, the only participant of the monovalent intransitive clauses, is treated the same as the Agent participant of bivalent monotransitive clauses; this treatment is called "Nominative". The Patient of bivalent monotransitive clauses is treated in some new, "Accusative" fashion.
In "Ergative" languages, the only participant of the monovalent intransitive clauses, is treated the same as the Patient participant of bivalent monotransitive clauses; this treatment is called "Absolutive". The Agent of bivalent monotransitive clauses is treated in some new, "Ergative" fashion.
In "Split-S" or "Split-Intransitive" or "Active" or "Active/Stative" languages, the only participant of some monovalent intransitive clauses, is treated like the Agent of bivalent monotransitive clauses (nominative); but the only participant of other monovalent clauses is treated like the Patient of bivalent monotransitive clauses (absolutive). In effect, "Active" intransitive clauses have an "Agent" for their only participant, while "Stative" intransitive clauses have a "Patient" for their only participant.
In "Split-Transitive" or "Austronesian" systems, there are two kinds of monotransitive bivalent clauses. In one kind, the Agent is treated the same as the only participant of monovalent clauses ("nominative"), while the Patient is treated in a new, "Accusative" way; in the other kind, the Patient is treated the same as the only participant of monovalent clauses ("nominative" (or "absolutive")), while the Agent is treated in a new, "Ergative" way.
In Tripartite languages, there are three treatments; Subjects of intransitives are treated one way (nominative or absolutive), Agents of transitives are treated another way (ergative), and Patients of transitives are treated yet a third way (accusative).
In Hierarchical languages, everybody knows by memory which participant is more animate and which less. If there is no voice-marking, the assumption is the more animate participant is the Agent and the less animate is the Patient; if the verb is in the Inverse Voice, that indicates the less-animate participant is the Agent and the more-animate participant is the Patient.
Some languages do not have a way, in a single clause, to communicate which participant is the Agent and which is the Patient. In the conlanging community this is called "the monster raving loony" alignment system. That's not what professional linguists call it, though.
There may be other systems as well.
-------------------------------------------------------------
There are refinements to morphosyntactic alignment, having to do with genitive phrases (or possessor/possession phrases), with copulae clauses, with ditransitive clauses, and so on. But above are the basics; the question is whether the subject of a monovalent intransitive clause, aligns with the patient of a bivalent monotransitive clause, or instead with the agent of such a clause, or some other system. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yssida
Joined: 16 Sep 2007 Posts: 253 Location: sa jaan lang
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I don't understand your question.
Is it that if the intransitive Subject and the transitive Agent are treated similarly, but the transitive Patient is treated differently, that's "Accusative" alignment instead of "Ergative" alignment?
Is it that in Ergative/Absolutive alignment systems, the intransitive Subject and the transitive Patient are treated similarly, but the transitive agent is treated differently?
If so, then, right, Vortex needs to clear that up.
|
The first one above is what I meant. It seems like he has an ergative and absolutive case which seems to point out that it is erg-abs, but then he treat S and A together whilst P is left out in the confusion. _________________ kasabot ka ani? aw di tingali ka bisaya mao na
my freewebs site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vortex
Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hasu Khomiyolao has a ergative-dative alignment. The subject of a intransitive verb, the patient of a monotransitive verb and the theme of a ditransitive verb take the absolutive case and the agent, sometimes the experiencer, of transitive verb takes the ergative case, and the reciever of a ditransitive sentence takes the dative case. One thing about the dative case is that it fused with two other cases, dedative and benefactive, so certain words will take the dative case when followed but the postpsitions luan-"in regards to, about, on" and souk-"for".
I hope that clears up the questions your where having yssida |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yssida
Joined: 16 Sep 2007 Posts: 253 Location: sa jaan lang
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, thanks
Quote: | These mark the patient of intransitive sentence and the agent of a transitive sentence. They are not used if the corresponding pronouns are being used. |
This is what stumped me. Well, back to my references again. _________________ kasabot ka ani? aw di tingali ka bisaya mao na
my freewebs site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eldin raigmore Admin
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Vortex. _________________ "We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|