View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:29 am Post subject: Conlang Peculiarities |
|
|
I had an idea for a topic - post any little peculiarities your lang has - little details that are not something you might think about normally.
For example (and for a first entry), since my lang rarely ever uses a copula, it uses the word for 'yes' as a suffix that confirms the previous statement - where in English you would say 'it is', in Raitoliste you would say 'ëia'.
Even the 'rarely uses a copula' part would be a good enough post. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Serali Admin

Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 929 Location: The Land Of Boingies
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Käläli has 2 words for 'you' Tasil and Wä. And there isn't a plural form you just use either Tasil or Wä. _________________
Tobo deu ne lenito sugu? - You kissed a frog?! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dhanus Admin
Joined: 06 Jul 2007 Posts: 192
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not completely sure if this would count, but it my language there is a specific form form for 'I am' to say what gender you are, Ra'g. Therefore there's also the past-tense of this pronoun, I was (male, female, a girl, a boy, etc.), Ra'k, which I would think would be rarely used. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Those are good, keep 'em coming!
Addendum to the original post: You don't use -ia when negating - 'ua ëia' is incorrect.
-ia is also used (still on the noun) to say 'very' - 'ëia eti' means 'it is very good'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
halyihev

Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 175 Location: Vermont, New England / Vrïtálá Kritsensá, Álurhná
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Alurhsa language has 70 phonemes.
It also has a second person deprecating pronoun and verb form, used when you want to show disdain or be insulting to someone. _________________ Dwirze ghárìlen ershónyá áqálán.
Álurhsá Ólevár/Alurhsa Website: http://alurhsa.org
Sehályensá Víláren/Bilingual Blog: http://blog.alurhsa.org
Álurhsá Ásálqáren/Alurhsa Board: http://forum.alurhsa.org |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
halyihev wrote: | The Alurhsa language has 70 phonemes. |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eldin raigmore Admin

Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Adpihi is highly synthetic but not exactly polysynthetic.
It's somewhere between agglutinative and fusional.
It morphologically marks both topic and focus.
It's verb-initial, head-initial, and right-branching*.
It's both topic-prominent and subject-prominent.
It's a clause-chaining language, but not a serial-verb language.
It has about 25 genders, I think; I'll have to look that up, I may be remembering wrong.
It doesn't allow affricates; consecutive consonants can't be homorganic.
It has 96 demonstratives, some of which are quite rare.
The demonstratives' system uses two deictic centers -- the speaker and the addressee -- and distinguishes between in-reach and out-of-reach, and between in-sight and out-of-sight, for both of them.
It is almost entirely both head-marking and dependent-marking.
It uses no, or very few, "floating markers" or "linkers".
It has 13 past tenses and 13 future tenses.
It has a tripartite-dative morphosyntactic alignment.
It has several "bivalent intransitive" ("S E") verbs; taking an S like an intransitive subject and an E like an indirect object.
*EDIT: Maybe it's left-branching instead. The "head-initial" is the part that is most important. I'll have to work with it a bit to see whether it's more left-branching or more right-branching.
Last edited by eldin raigmore on Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Serali Admin

Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 929 Location: The Land Of Boingies
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tolkien_Freak wrote: | halyihev wrote: | The Alurhsa language has 70 phonemes. |
 |
 _________________
Tobo deu ne lenito sugu? - You kissed a frog?! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
StrangeMagic Admin

Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 640
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eldin raigmore wrote: | Adpihi is highly synthetic but not exactly polysynthetic.
It's somewhere between agglutinative and fusional.
It morphologically marks both topic and focus.
It's verb-initial, head-initial, and right-branching.
It's both topic-prominent and subject-prominent.
It's a clause-chaining language, but not a serial-verb language.
It has about 25 genders, I think; I'll have to look that up, I may be remembering wrong.
It doesn't allow affricates; consecutive consonants can't be homorganic.
It has 96 demonstratives, some of which are quite rare.
The demonstratives' system uses two deictic centers -- the speaker and the addressee -- and distinguishes between in-reach and out-of-reach, and between in-sight and out-of-sight, for both of them.
It is almost entirely both head-marking and dependent-marking.
It uses no, or very few, "floating markers" or "linkers".
It has 13 past tenses and 13 future tenses.
It has a tripartite-dative morphosyntactic alignment.
It has several "bivalent intransitive" ("S E") verbs; taking an S like an intransitive subject and an E like an indirect object. |
Wow, that is scary.
My conlang has no diphthongs and there are at least two uncommon tenses: mystic and hopeful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Serali Admin

Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 929 Location: The Land Of Boingies
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know.....  _________________
Tobo deu ne lenito sugu? - You kissed a frog?! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eccentric Iconoclast
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aquénandi IS a peculiarity. The words aren't set beyond the basic morphemes, so you have to agglutinate morphemes together while you speak and Make Your Own Words depending on the context rather than using "set" words. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tolkien_Freak

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1231 Location: in front of my computer. always.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That sounds confusing.
(Actually, reading through your post about it in the relevant thread, it sounds awesome.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Serali Admin

Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 929 Location: The Land Of Boingies
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
It does sound confusing reading the bit that you posted. Hopefully when I read your other post I'll understand it. _________________
Tobo deu ne lenito sugu? - You kissed a frog?! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aeetlrcreejl

Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 839 Location: Over yonder
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Le has no nasals and has [S] but no [s]. Some of you may know that.
eldin raigmore wrote: | Adpihi is highly synthetic but not exactly polysynthetic.
It's somewhere between agglutinative and fusional.
It morphologically marks both topic and focus.
It's verb-initial, head-initial, and right-branching.
It's both topic-prominent and subject-prominent.
It's a clause-chaining language, but not a serial-verb language.
It has about 25 genders, I think; I'll have to look that up, I may be remembering wrong.
It doesn't allow affricates; consecutive consonants can't be homorganic.
It has 96 demonstratives, some of which are quite rare.
The demonstratives' system uses two deictic centers -- the speaker and the addressee -- and distinguishes between in-reach and out-of-reach, and between in-sight and out-of-sight, for both of them.
It is almost entirely both head-marking and dependent-marking.
It uses no, or very few, "floating markers" or "linkers".
It has 13 past tenses and 13 future tenses.
It has a tripartite-dative morphosyntactic alignment.
It has several "bivalent intransitive" ("S E") verbs; taking an S like an intransitive subject and an E like an indirect object. |
That sounds somewhat like a description of Lorošae.
Also, Neiriko has about 100 phonemes. _________________ Iwocwá ĵọṭãsák.
/iwotSwa_H d`Z`Ot`~asa_Hk/
[iocwa_H d`Z`Ot`_h~a_Hk] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
langover94
Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 509 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
in Danšlağ there is a 2 syllable copula. also, to make a word past tense, you would say "fafara" (did) before the word. (however, this mostly works only with verbs). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eldin raigmore Admin

Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Serali wrote: | Käläli has 2 words for 'you' Tasil and Wä. And there isn't a plural form you just use either Tasil or Wä. | Interesting. So, what is the difference between Tasil and Wa?
halyihev wrote: | The Alurhsa language ... has a second person deprecating pronoun and verb form, used when you want to show disdain or be insulting to someone. | Interesting. Any details? Any examples?
StrangeMagic wrote: | My conlang has ... at least two uncommon tenses: mystic and hopeful. | How, when, by whom, and why are they used? If they are tenses, that implies they are either present or past or future, or at least non-past or non-future. Are they? If so, which? "Hopeful" sounds more like a mood than like a tense; "mystic" doesn't sound like any verb accident I've heard of before. Could you explain?
Eccentric Iconoclast wrote: | Aquénandi IS a peculiarity. The words aren't set beyond the basic morphemes, so you have to agglutinate morphemes together while you speak and Make Your Own Words depending on the context rather than using "set" words. | That sounds like a good description of "polysynthetic". Is that what you meant?
Aeetlrcreejl wrote: | That sounds somewhat like a description of Lorošae. | What's Lorosae? A natlang or a conlang? If a conlang, yours or someone else's? Where can I find out more about it? If it's a natlang, what family is it in, where is it spoken, and how many speakers does it have? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aeetlrcreejl

Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 839 Location: Over yonder
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
eldin raigmore wrote: | Aeetlrcreejl wrote: | That sounds somewhat like a description of Lorošae. | What's Lorosae? A natlang or a conlang? If a conlang, yours or someone else's? Where can I find out more about it? If it's a natlang, what family is it in, where is it spoken, and how many speakers does it have? |
Lorošae is one of my conlangs. No information is available on the web and besides me and you all, 2 people know of its existence.
Off-topic: I can't find the sheet witrh all my info on the Neiriko script! Eheu!
EDIT: I found it! YAY! _________________ Iwocwá ĵọṭãsák.
/iwotSwa_H d`Z`Ot`~asa_Hk/
[iocwa_H d`Z`Ot`_h~a_Hk] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
StrangeMagic Admin

Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 640
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | How, when, by whom, and why are they used? If they are tenses, that implies they are either present or past or future, or at least non-past or non-future. Are they? If so, which? "Hopeful" sounds more like a mood than like a tense; "mystic" doesn't sound like any verb accident I've heard of before. Could you explain? |
The Mystic tense shows that the actions are unsure if they are real and so they are no 1st and 2nd person forms. This will not change when it is talking about the future or past, because it should be clear in the contect.
Code: | Person Consonant A,E,U I,O
he -ajaran -jara -kujara
she -aharan -hara -kuhara
it -ilanan -lana -kulana
they -angunga -ngun -kungun |
The hopeful tense is more of an suffix or mood than a tense. It is used whenever the sentence has I "hope", "desire", "wish" in. They are added to the verb they want happening.
Code: | Consonant A,E,U I,O
-aralto -najaro -minplu |
There are many forms, for example
I wish he is coming
Cliwibataralto
Cli-wi-bat-aralto
Come-(IO)-CON-(C)HOP
I wish he has come
Candi cliwiolaralto
Cand-i cli-wiol-aralto
Have-(C)3-PRS come-(IO)3-PER-(C)HOP |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aeetlrcreejl

Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 839 Location: Over yonder
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't those be moods? _________________ Iwocwá ĵọṭãsák.
/iwotSwa_H d`Z`Ot`~asa_Hk/
[iocwa_H d`Z`Ot`_h~a_Hk] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eldin raigmore Admin

Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1621 Location: SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aeetlrcreejl wrote: | Wouldn't those be moods? | Yes. Both would be kinds of "irrealis" mood.
The "mystic" would be what is usually called the "dubitative" (doubtful). In many Indo-European languages the mood usually called "subjunctive" (because it is used for subordinate clauses) is also used as a dubitative.
The "hopeful" mood would usually be called "optative", though I can't say "hopeful" isn't a better name. Probably StrangeMagic should note that what he calls the "hopeful" mood is better known as "optative"; but keep calling it "hopeful" himself.
Many people call all tense-aspect-mood accidents of verbs "tense". I would prefer to distinguish tenses from aspects from moods. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|