Vreleksá Forum Index Vreleksá
The Alurhsa Word for Constructed: Creativity in both scripts and languages
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Help with verbs

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vreleksá Forum Index -> Conlangs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Aert



Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 354

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:49 am    Post subject: Help with verbs Reply with quote

Helloo,

I'm working on the verb system in my language but have hit a stumbling block... I'm trying to make a hierarchy of a couple (dozen?) basic, general verbs with a bunch of more specific verbs in each of the sections. The more specific the verb is, the longer it is, as sounds are added to the original, basic verb each step you go.

The problem is that I can't seem to get them into the wide groupings. Some have worked really well, like creating/making things, or movement. Others, like eating, sleeping, working; to have, play, find, plan, and so on, are harder to put into general groups.

I'm planning on having a suffix that identifies the verb as a noun instead of the verb, and another that identifies it as someone who does this (as in the English set {to dance, a dance, a dancer}).

The good news is I do have the conjugation system pretty much done Very Happy I just need something to wrap them around Wink

Does anyone have some suggestions, links, or thoughts on this? That would be great!

Thanks in advance!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hemicomputer



Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 610
Location: Calgary, Alberta

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe an "inactivity" group: to sit, to lie, to stand, to sleep, etc. An "intangiable action" group might have things like to be, to know, to have.
For "find" and "plan", perhaps a "thinking" group. You might have to have an "other" group, or put some verbs into groups where they don't totally belong, but this would just help the language sound more natural.

Hope this helps! Smile
_________________
Bakram uso, mi abila, / del us bakrat, dahud bakrita!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eldin raigmore
Admin


Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 1621
Location: SouthEast Michigan

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's lots of stuff about this, and the problem is to gather it all, to make it fit together, and to throw out what's too much for your current purpose.

Here's SIL's list of "Kinds of Verbs": (Note it doesn't claim to be exhaustive):
SIL Glossary Of Linguistic Terms wrote:
Kinds
Here are some kinds of verbs:
What is an auxiliary verb?
What is a conjunctive verb?
What is a copula?
What is a defective verb?
What is a finite verb?
What is an impersonal verb?
What is an irregular verb?
What is a lexical verb?
What is a nonfinite verb?
What is a phrasal verb?
What is a reflexive verb?
Look up the discussions of the individual terms in the SIL Glossary.

Here's another worthwhile list of types of verbs, many of which you might find useful, or at least worth considering. It make no claim to be exhaustive.

You need to look at the individual articles for the type, but here is a copy of the list:
Wikipedia wrote:
A
Andative and venitive
Anticausative verb
C
Captative verb
Catenative verb
Control verb
Copula
List of English copulae
D
Ditransitive verb
Dynamic verb
F
Frequentative
G
Germanic strong verb
Germanic verb
Germanic weak verb
I
Impersonal verb
Intensive
Intransitive verb
L
Light verb
M
Middle High German verbs
Momentane
Monotransitive verb
P
Performative verb
Predicative verb
R
Reciprocal (grammar)
Regular verb
S
Separable verb
Serial verb construction
Stative verb
Stretched verb
Strong inflection
T
Transitive verb
V
Valency (linguistics)
W
Weak inflection
Z
Zero copula



Some of the following ideas are probably very useful but are missing from Wikipedia's list, which is OK since Wikipedia's list only mentions those that Wikipedia has articles about.

-----------------

Look up search-terms meaning, roughly, something like "What kinds of verbs are there?" on the CONLANG-L mailing list and on the spinnoff.com/ZBB phpBBoard forum. There may be something in either or both; in fact, there probably is.

------------------

Most clauses in most languages come in one of the following four types (maybe not all languages have all four types);

S
A U
S E
A U E

where "S" means "Subject" (e.g. maybe "agent-patient")
"A" means "Actor"
"U" means "Undergoer"
"E" means "Extended-core Participant" (e.g. something necessary to the meaning, but neither in control of, nor affected by, the action; for instance, a thing sought.)

(the "S E" type clauses are "bivalent intransitive" clauses. Some linguists think many languages don't have many, or maybe don't have any, such clauses; other linguists think most languages have many of them, but they've been ignored by linguists until recently.)

You might also consider 0-participant verbs ("impersonal" verbs) and verbs with four participants ("tetravalent" verbs, often considered equivalent with "tritransitive" verbs).

---------------------------------

For some languages it is useful to divide clauses into the following pairs of types;

* Those with one or fewer participant vs those with two or more participants.
* Those with either the speaker or the addressee as a participant vs those with only 3rd-person participants.
* Those with at least one 3rd-person participant vs those with only speaker and/or addressee as participant(s).
* Those with at least one animate participant vs those with only inanimate participant(s).
* Those with at least one inanimate participant vs those with only animate participant(s).

-----------------

Some linguists divide verbs according to whether they indicate:

* a state "There the ball sits".
* a change of state "the ball rolled from here to there".
* causing a change of state "I kicked the ball from here to there."

Like the first classification, this is not necessarily exhaustive, at least not IMO.

-----------------

For some purposes some linguists divide verbs into the following three types;
* those that cannot have a clause as a participant
* those that must have a clause as a participant (e.g. "think", "say", "wish");
* those that may, or may not, have a clause as a participant.

While this is exhaustive, and theoretically mutually-exclusive, it may be hard sometimes to decide whether a particular verb belongs in one class or in another; though it's almost always easy to pick a class it doesn't belong to.

---------------

The "action" vs "state" division is one that cuts across the "monovalent" vs "bivalent" division.

-----------------

Also, look at Vendler's system of aktionsarts.

---------------

See this for some ideas.
In particular, "verbs of uncaused motion" and "verbs of caused motion".
This looks like it might also help.
This pdf might be an inspiration; note, it's a pdf (some people like to be warned).

--------------------

EDIT:
I don't know if these help.
search #1
Search #2
search #3
_________________
"We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission


Last edited by eldin raigmore on Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:35 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aert



Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 354

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WOW Shocked That will definitely help! Thank you both! Idea
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eldin raigmore
Admin


Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 1621
Location: SouthEast Michigan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW this thread contains a link to "Vendler's aktionsarts":
This guy wrote:
The most general approaches to classification of Lexical Aspects as individual categories make a binary distinction (e.g., stative vs. dynamic, telic vs. atelic, durative vs. punctual). Vendler's (1967) quadripartite classification of verb phrases into aspectual classes is currently the best-known and well-accepted classification.' Taking telicity as the basis of the division, Vendler (1967) categorized all English verbs into four classes with respect to the temporal properties that they encode: activities, accomplishments, achievements, and states.
For more detail, also see this pdf.

Examples:
States: know, have, be broken, be dead, believe, like, ...
Achievements: learn, receive, break (Intransitive), die, recognize, arrive, ...
Accomplishments: teach, give, break (Transitive), kill, convince, please, ...
Activities: read, shiver, swim, rain, think, talk, ...

Van Valin (1993c) characterizes these classes in terms of a small set of semantic features: [±telic], [±dynamic], [±causative], and [±punctual].

See also the "Logical Structure" stuff in that last cited paper, beginning on page 19 (or 25) right after table 2.17.
_________________
"We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aert



Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 354

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice! Thanks! I have a spot for a little over a hundred verbs now (though I still need to translate them Wink ) This will help a lot with the ones I've been stuck on Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eldin raigmore
Admin


Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 1621
Location: SouthEast Michigan

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW there's a worthwhile thread right now on CONLANG-L.
Lars Finsen sent me the following:
On Thursday, July 10, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Lars Finsen <lars.finsen@ORTYGIA.NO> wrote:
To: "Eldin Raigmore" <eldin_raigmore@YAHOO.COM>
Den 10. jul. 2008 kl. 20.31 skreiv Eldin Raigmore wrote:
I have a correspondent on a BBoard (don't recall if it's Vreleksa or the CBB or the ZBB) who wants to know about classifying verbs.
I think s/he would like a look at your list. Mind if I point him/her to it?
Not at all, I'd only be glad. BTW, I've edited categories 1 and 15 a little below:
Lars Finsen wrote:
  1. Adjectives, adverbs and prepositions pertaining to existence, relation, order, number, quantity, time; existence verbs
  2. Pronouns, conjunctions, particles, prefixes, suffixes, interjections
  3. Nouns pertaining to dead matter and its shapes and properties
  4. Adjectives and adverbs pertaining to dead matter and its shapes and properties
  5. Nouns, adjectives and adverbs pertaining to vegetable matter
  6. Nouns, adjectives and adverbs pertaining to non-human animal matter
  7. Nouns, adjectives and adverbs pertaining to humans, human body parts and physical functions
  8. Nouns, adjectives and adverbs pertaining to human mental functions
  9. Nouns, adjectives and adverbs pertaining to work and objects or materials worked upon
  10. General descriptive verbs
  11. Verbs pertaining to motion
  12. Verbs pertaining to change of shape
  13. Verbs pertaining to change of structure
  14. Verbs pertaining to other change of material properties
  15. Verbs pertaining to relation, exchange, communication, non-destructive influence and reaction to such influence
  16. Verbs pertaining to life processes, senses, feelings, body functions
  17. Verbs pertaining to work, order, measuring, intellectual processes, abstract actions
Greetings,
Lars

_________________
"We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aert



Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 354

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks!! There still have been some holes in where the heck to put some of these, this should help fill them Very Happy It's quite complete!

Another question Wink :

Does a conlang need cases? I've checked out German, and quite frankly, think it's overcomplicated. I'm trying to keep my conlang simple (at least on the surface) with no cases, genders (except for animals/people), and conjugations don't change with the pronoun, just tense, mood, etc.

Can't cases be inferred? I don't see any obvious changes to a noun in different case situations in English.

Thanks!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
langover94



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 509
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You don't have to have cases although they do certainly make a conlang more interesting.

Never build a conlang completely off of English. In fact, I'm surprised English didn't acquire cases, because most of its vocabulary came from both German and Latin, which have rich case systems.
_________________
Join us at: The Renewed Spirits Forum!
Please join for good discussion. (We need members!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aert



Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 354

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree that you shouldn't make a conlang off a single language. I'm taking ideas from all over the place, but I'm still trying to keep the foundation simple. Right now, as far as I can see cases just aren't necessary.

Do you mean they make a language more interesting because they give the written and spoken words more variety?

As for English not having cases, I wonder if it did in the middle ages, when it was highly influenced by the other Germanic languages. Then later, lost them after the French took over (and then left) and was more influenced by the local Celtic languages, as well as the trading partners in Europe and later trade routes. Pure speculation, though Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eldin raigmore
Admin


Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 1621
Location: SouthEast Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lots of languages in real life don't have cases.
Verb-initial languages tend not to need cases so much.
Verb-medial languages tend to have rather fewish cases.
It's verb-final langauges that tend to have a lot of them.

Polypersonal-agreement languages tend not to need lots of cases.
Strong-case-system languages tend not to have strong agreement-systems.

Isolating or analytic languages seem not to have lots of cases.
Languages that do a lot of object-incorporating don't need lots of cases.
"Polysynthetic" languages don't need a lot of cases.
Cases are mostly found in agglutinating languages and in "fusional" languages.

----------------

The information in a language's case-system have to be conveyable by some means in any other language; but not necessarily by cases. Ordinarily, anything that could be conveyed by nominal case could equally well have been conveyed by verbal voice; and vice-versa.

Lots of languages have many adpositions, or even adverbs or auxiliaries, to convey what other languages would convey by case.

--------------

Try, if you want, to make a language that can say anything that can be said in a cased (some say "casual") language, but has to say it without cases. That will give you some ideas about what cases do.
_________________
"We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eldin raigmore
Admin


Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 1621
Location: SouthEast Michigan

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everyone here should look at
the Universal Language Dictionary
to see its word-classification system.
Roget's Thesaurus also has one; and so does Zompist's thematic dictionary of Verdurian and Almean languages.

@Aert, look also at WeepingElf's system:
In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> wrote:
Here is the classification system I used when I set up my first substantial word lists in Urianian. There are 17 broad classes that I modified as I went along to contain roughly the same number of words and give me a good overview over each class as they grew. The names of the classes indicate how further subdivision could be made, if necessary.
The classification I use in my Old Albic thematic dictionary is currently this:
  1. General
    1. States
    2. Time, Events
    3. Effort
    4. Space, Extent
    5. Weights and Measurees
    6. Contents
    7. Shape and Form
    8. Colour
    9. Physical action, Movement, Transfer

  2. Nature
    1. The World
    2. Substances
    3. Weather
    4. The Life Cycle
    5. Plants
    6. Animals
    7. Body, Senses, Health
    8. The Soul
    9. Food

  3. The Human Sphere
    1. Society
    2. Morality
    3. Love and Family
    4. Politics
    5. Law
    6. Nations
    7. Conflict and War
    8. Economy
    9. Craft
    10. Vehicles
    11. Utensils
    12. Houses, urban and rural life
    13. Science
    14. Religion
    15. Art
    16. Language
    17. Magic

_________________
"We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eldin raigmore
Admin


Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 1621
Location: SouthEast Michigan

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Help with verbs Reply with quote

Aert wrote:
... I'm working on the verb system ... The problem is that I can't seem to get them into the wide groupings. Some have worked really well, like creating/making things, or movement. Others, like eating, sleeping, working; to have, play, find, plan, and so on, are harder to put into general groups. ... Does anyone have some suggestions, links, or thoughts on this? ...
Note that what's the patient (etc.) can depend on the speaker's attitude.

Q: What happened to the cake I was going to serve for dessert at the twins' big birthday tommorrow?
A: Oh, I didn't know you were saving it. I ate it all.

"I ate the cake", in this case, has "the cake" as the patient. Ordinarily, when someone or something consumes something, the thing consumed is a patient; it changes state from existing to not-existing, and is the "incremental theme"; that is, while the verb is going on, one can see how far it has advanced by how much of the cake is left.

Q: What happened to the baby? Where are you taking him?
A: I've got to take him to the hospital; he ate all of the rat-poison.

"The baby at the rat poison" has, in this case, "the baby" as the patient. Even though the rat-poison was consumed, what's interesting to both the speaker and the addressee is the effect this had on the baby, not the effect it had on the poison.

--------------------------------

So, you might have a group of "destructive verbs"; this would be a subgroup of verbs in which somethings state-of-existence is changed (say from not-being to being, or, in this case, from being-to-not-being. A third subgroup might be things like growing up, marrying, dying, being born, giving birth, killing, divorcing, adopting, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, crowning or electing, etc.)

And you might also have a group of "ingestive verbs".

But "eat" might fall in both categories.

"I ate the sandwich" could be thought of as "I fed myself (using the sandwich)". Essentially the speaker is thinking of this as something the agent did to himself/herself, and the sandwich is an instrument with which this is done; (some instrument or other might be obligatory).

Or, it could be "I destroyed the sandwich (by eating it)".

A voice-alternation, and/or a case-alternation, might be used to show this difference in the speaker's point-of-view or attitude.

"Burn" might also fall into both categories. When you burn a chair, are you keeping the fire going by feeding it something (the chair was handy and you didn't need it anymore or it was irreparably broken already)? Or are you destroying the chair (perhaps because it was evidence of a crime), and burning seemed a good way to do that?
_________________
"We're the healthiest horse in the glue factory" - Erskine Bowles, Co-Chairman of the deficit reduction commission
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aert



Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 354

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good questions to ponder, thanks for bringing them up!

Quote:
So, you might have a group of "destructive verbs"; this would be a subgroup of verbs in which somethings state-of-existence is changed (say from not-being to being, or, in this case, from being-to-not-being. A third subgroup might be things like growing up, marrying, dying, being born, giving birth, killing, divorcing, adopting, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, crowning or electing, etc.)


I do have a group of 'creation' verbs, as well as it's opposite 'destruction' verbs; two different groups for 'change' (as the conculture I'm working on revolves around change) and some specific change verbs we don't have in English.

There's also a method to make a verb it's opposite (not it's negative; ie to create -> to destroy) that makes a lot of new and useful verbs. I haven't gotten around to the job verbs yet, but I now have some ideas Very Happy

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hemicomputer



Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 610
Location: Calgary, Alberta

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aert wrote:
...There's also a method to make a verb it's opposite (not it's negative; ie to create -> to destroy) that makes a lot of new and useful verbs. I haven't gotten around to the job verbs yet, but I now have some ideas Very Happy...


Does this mean that there would be different verbs for "destroy" and "un-create"? It would be kind of fun to have a language with that much semantic specification.

Random side note: I like your whole idea of grouping verbs! It would make the language easy to pick up and to get the general idea of a phrase even with limited vocabulary. The system would lend itself well to word-coining, too.
_________________
Bakram uso, mi abila, / del us bakrat, dahud bakrita!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vreleksá Forum Index -> Conlangs
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Theme ACID © 2003 par HEDONISM Web Hosting Directory


Start Your Own Video Sharing Site

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | FlashWebHost.com | Image Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBBweb.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com