Vreleksá

Zearen Wover · Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 11

I wasn't sure where to but this, but decided the dirty version was more of a rewriting then a new math. The clean version, which is not yet completed, is certainly alien enough to our mathematics, that I'd classify it under conlang. It's based on recursion of functions, starting with only two functions and an inversion marker, o, c and c. . Alas I have a lot of math to work out with this version, thus I will demonstrate DV (Dirty Version)

An overview of the script using the actual glyphs can be found here: fig. 1

This script has the advantage that variable numbers and numbers are always strait lines and dots where variable functions and functions are lines and at least one curve.

However, it can still be written with Latin characters, using Arabic numerals. The main idea is that everything is a function. c is the addition function, adding one to the given value. All functions have an inferred open parentheses, close parentheses is '|'. Eg.

c1|=2
c2|=3

o is technically a recursion marker, fzox| meaning 'take f(x) of itself z times'. Eg, f3ox| = f(f(f(x))). In FV (Formal Version), f0ox| = x for all f. A function followed by a dot means invert the function in FV, though it's used rather loosely in DV.

italics indicate standard notation or SN
cx|=x+1
czox|=x+z
c.x|=-x *In FV, this is x-1, one must write cxo0| for -x
c.zox|=x-z *Note that the arguments are reversed!

FV bases all other functions off c. DV however explicitly defines each function based on SN. Look at fig.1 to see the rest of the DV definitions. Note that exponentiation is e in latin, so:

ezox|=x^z *Notice how this is also backwards.

If one wants to add or multiply more than two numbers, one must use multiple functions, Ie

x+z+v=cvoczox||

Here are some more examples: fig. 2

What do you guys think, or do any of you have a conmath?
_________________

Kiri · Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:02 pm Post subject:

I'm sorry, but the only way of me possibly understanding what you just said would be face-to-face in Latvian Very Happy

I don't know about conmath as a whole, but some here have non-decimal number systems, if you're interested in that.
_________________
A Latvian. A language-freak.
Latvietis. Ķerts uz valodām.
an latvan Antra. an Rīnolaiewruj.
Ratvaxantršitkak. Rihraxehitkak.

Aert · Joined: 03 Jul 2008 Posts: 203

I developed a simple Chemistry notation that's helpful for biochem and basically anything with rings, if you're interested.

The letters are all the normal elements, but you could change them to whatever.

Tolkien_Freak · Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 872 Location: Everu

I like the idea of conmath a lot. I'm just not enough of a math person to develop my own (though I might in the future, to give more depth to my conworld).

I think I understand what you're saying, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment on it.
_________________
'We are the knights who say, "に!"'

「私たちに理性と知性を与えた神は、その神と同じのは、その使いを捨てるつもりがあると信じざるを得なさそうではない。｣
　－ガリレオ･ガリレイ

My friend, after an intense 10-minute session of being yelled at by my Latin teacher: 'Well, at least I know my verb cases...'

Serali · Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:33 am Post subject:

Well math is not my subject but I have to say I find this fascinating indeed. I love the scripts.

_________________

Tobo deu ne lenito sugu? - You kissed a frog?!

Dhanus · Ex-Admin Joined: 06 Jul 2007 Posts: 199

This is very interesting. I look forward to seeing more.

Kiri · Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:06 pm Post subject:

Actually, can anyone tell me the concept of a conmath, as itself? I mean, 2+2=4, and nothing can change that. Or am I wrong?
_________________
A Latvian. A language-freak.
Latvietis. Ķerts uz valodām.
an latvan Antra. an Rīnolaiewruj.
Ratvaxantršitkak. Rihraxehitkak.

Zearen Wover · Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 11

Kiri · Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject:

Tolkien_Freak · Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 872 Location: Everu

"Base" as in 'how many numbers do you count until you rewrite it one-zero'.

So base 10 is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.

Emitare uses base 8, which is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10. (10 = what in English is called 'eight')

So for base 4 you have 1 2 3 10, and base 3 is 1 2 10.

Yeah, two plus two equals four, but you might end up writing that four as one-zero or one-one.
_________________
'We are the knights who say, "に!"'

「私たちに理性と知性を与えた神は、その神と同じのは、その使いを捨てるつもりがあると信じざるを得なさそうではない。｣
　－ガリレオ･ガリレイ

My friend, after an intense 10-minute session of being yelled at by my Latin teacher: 'Well, at least I know my verb cases...'

Kiri · Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:57 am Post subject:

Yes all that is true, but what I'm saying is that two plus two equals four no matter if you write it as 8, 10, 14 or 98.
_________________
A Latvian. A language-freak.
Latvietis. Ķerts uz valodām.
an latvan Antra. an Rīnolaiewruj.
Ratvaxantršitkak. Rihraxehitkak.

Tolkien_Freak · Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 872 Location: Everu

Yes.

So a conmath is merely a different way to write numbers, not different numbers.
_________________
'We are the knights who say, "に!"'

「私たちに理性と知性を与えた神は、その神と同じのは、その使いを捨てるつもりがあると信じざるを得なさそうではない。｣
　－ガリレオ･ガリレイ

My friend, after an intense 10-minute session of being yelled at by my Latin teacher: 'Well, at least I know my verb cases...'

Kiri · Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 7:26 pm Post subject:

Thank you, that's what I wanted to know Smile

_________________
A Latvian. A language-freak.
Latvietis. Ķerts uz valodām.
an latvan Antra. an Rīnolaiewruj.
Ratvaxantršitkak. Rihraxehitkak.